Ni 11 June, 2026 khan Gauhati High Court, Aizawl Bench chuan Supreme Court-in Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India and Others thubuaia thu a lo pek tawh bawhzuiin, Mizoram-a Open Correctional Institutions (OCI) din tura State Sorkar hmalakna dinhmun chu ngaihtuah a ni a. He thubuai hi Division Bench, Justice Ashutosh Kumar leh Justice Michael Zothankhuma te’n an ngaihtuah a ni. Sorkar chuan Supreme Court thupek angin OCI din a nih theih dan tur leh a a tul dante enfiah a ngai a. Additional Advocate General, Linda L Fambawl chuan State Sorkar thutlukna chu thubuai ngaihtuah leh a nih hmain chipchiar taka affidavit thehluh a nih tur thu a thlen a. He thubuai hi June 17, 2026-a ngaihtuah leh tura ruahman a ni nghal bawk.

He thubuai hi April 8, 2026 khan Supreme Court thupek bawhzuiin High Court-in ama thuin (suo motu) writ petition a ziaklut a. State Sorkar leh a hnuaia department kaihhnawihte hnenah hriattirna pek chhuah an ni a, Open Correctional Institutions din leh tihzauh chungchanga Supreme Court thutlukna zawm tura an hmalaknate chu Secretary aia hniam loin affidavit kaltlanga kimchang taka thehlut turin hriattir an ni.

Tin, May 13, 2026 khan High Court-ah hian ngaihtuah chhunzawm a ni a. Hemi ṭum hian State Sorkar chuan OCI din a nih theih dan tur leh a ṭul dan enfiah turin State Monitoring Committee a din thu a thlen a, mahse a bawhzui hna erawh inṭan chauh a la nih thu a sawi. Hmalakna thar berte Court hnena thehlut turin Sorkar chuan hun pek belh a ngen a. An ngenna hi ngaihtuah sakin, thla thum chhunga OCI te hi din turin Supreme Court-in a hriattir tih tarlang chungin, Court chuan hmalakna dinhmun thar ber affidavit hmanga thehlut turin chawlhkar thum hun a lo pe tawh a ni.

Suhas Chakma Case:

Supreme Court chuan, Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India and Others [WP(C) No. 1082 of 2020] thubuai-ah hian tan in siamthat chungchang leh tangte dikna chanvo leh an zahawmna humhalh a tulzia a ngaihtuah a. Jail tawt lutuk leh an nun siamthatna tura hmalakna mumal a awm loh hian, tangte'n khawtlanga khua leh tui tha anga let leh theihna hun tha an neih tur a tichhe thin tih Court chuan a hmu a ni. Tan ina tangte zinga security khauh lo zawk hnuaia inkhuahkhirh chunga hna an thawh leh an khawsak theihna hmun, Open Correctional Institutions (OCIs) hian pawikhawih lehna tihtlem kawngah leh tangte khawtlang nuna inzeh luh leh theihna turin rah tha tak a chhuah tawh thin tih a tarlang bawk.

Tan in siamthatna tura hmalakna hi tihchak a nih theih nan, Supreme Court chuan State leh Union Territory tinte chu OCI thar din theih dan tur leh a tul dan emaw, a awmsa tihzauh theih dan tur ngun taka zirchiang turin thu a pe a. Court chuan thuneitute chu State Monitoring Committee din tur leh, OCI dinna tur hmun remchang zawng chhuak turin a hriattir a. Chu mai bakah, tan ina tangte OCI-a awm tura tlin theih dan tur tehna (eligibility criteria) duang tur leh, hetiang hmun ruahman a nih hian hmeichhe tangte leh mi tang naupawmte pawh ngaihtuahnaah telh ve ngei turin a ti bawk.

Heng thupekte hi tha taka zawm a ni em tih vil turin High Court zawng zawngte chu mahni thu a thubuai ziaklût (suo motu) turin thu a pe a. State-te chu thla thum chhung ngeia heng hmalaknate hi peihfel a, OCI din tur leh, hlawhtling taka hmalak a nih theih nan hmalak chin tarlanna thehlut ziah turin a ti bawk a ni(www.jclalnunsanga.in)

(He thubuai hi WPC Suo Moto 1/2026, In Re Establishment, Functioning and Expansion of Open Correctional Institutions in Mizoram, Aizawl,Mizoram vs State of Mizoram & 4Ors ah hian Petitioner tan Amicus AR Malhotra a ding a; a chhangtute tan Addl Adv. General Linda L Fambawl a ding)