DISCLAIMER

 1.⁠ ⁠Mizo ten dan leh hrai chungchanga  an lo bengvar nan leh thudik rintlak an hriat theih nan he website hi siam a ni a. 

2.⁠ ⁠Mizo ten Court rorelna kan hriat fiah leh hriat chian tawk loh avangin harsatna kan tawk thin a. Court rorelna leh dan te hi English a ziak a nih avangin mi nawlpui te tan hriat thiam a har thin a. English a in ziak te chhiar tur tam tak national news a a awm laiin mahni tawng ngeia kan lo hriat ve nan thuthar ber berte tarlan a ni ang. 

3.⁠ ⁠Mizo mipui ten kan hriatthiam tlan theih dan tur berin Supreme Court, High Court leh District Court te mipuite hriat tura pawimawhte a  rang thei a i chhiar theih tura lo chhawp chhuah  hi kan tum a ni. 

(The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.jclalnunsanga.in, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to JC Lalnunsanga, Advocate & Legal Consultant  of your own accord) 

Exit

Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Lok Adalat Award Hi Court in A Thiat Thei Lo; Article 227 Hnuaiah Chauh Thawi Damna A Awm

Supreme Court: Lok Adalat Award Hi Court in A Thiat Thei Lo; Article 227 Hnuaiah Chauh Thawi Damna A Awm

  • 11/12/2025
  • JC

November ni 18,2025 khan Supreme Court chuan Legal Services Authorities Act,1987 (LSA) hnuaia  Lok Adalat award  pass chu court in thiah leh hnial theihna thuneihna a nei lo a ti. Constitution hnuaia Article 227-a High Court thuneihna hmang chauhin award hi dodal a nih theih thu an sawi.He thubuai hi Justice Vikram Nath leh Justice Sandeep Mehta-te thutna bench chuan an ngaihtuah a. Jabalpur Lok Adalat decree challenge-na  chu Madhya Pradesh High Court-ah thehluh  a ni a, High Court hian chuan a lo ngaihtuah duh lo a. Supreme Court chuan High Court thutlukna chu a thiahsak a ni.An Buaina Bul:Thubuai thehluttu hian May ni 14,2022-a Jabalpur Lok Adalat award chhuah ah chuan lungawi lovin Madhya Pradesh High Court-ah a zualko a.High Court hian he thubuai hi a ngaihtuah sak duh lova, thubuai thehluttu in CPC(Civil Procedure Code) hnuaia Order XXI Rule 101-a court hmaa objection a thehlut tawh tiin a hnawlsak .Supreme Court Ngaihdan leh Thutlukna:Court chuan Lok Adalat Award hian LSA Act hnuaiah dan finality a nei tih a sawi uar hle a. Civil court award te hi binding anga ngaih a ni a, nimahsela, civil thawi damna (remedy) kaltlangin challenge a ni theilo .Supreme Court chuan High court-in he thubuai a kalpui dan chu kenkawh a nih theih loh thu a sawi a. Court hnathawh chu award tihpuitlinna chauh a ni a, award thiah theihna thuneiha a nei lo a ti. Bench chuan a hnuaia point ang hian a tarlang a ni :  Court chuan Lok Adalat award a thiat thei loCPC hnuaia Order XXI-a objection thehluh chu award challenge na tlukpuiah a hman theih loh.Supreme Court chuan thubuai thehluttuin Lok Adalat thutlukna a challenge na chu kal pui zel tlak a ni a ti a, High Court-in a enfiah duh loh chu a dem hle a. Supreme Court chuan High court hnawlna order chu thiatin, High court-ah ngaihtuah tha leh turin thutlukna a siam a ni(www.jclalnunsanga.in)(He thubuai hi Dilip Mehta Vs Rakesh Gupta & Ors a ni a. Thubuai thehluttu tan Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr Adv leh midangte an ding a. Lehlam tan hian Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr Adv leh midangte an ding thung a ni).

Supreme Court: Bail-a Awm Mek Chu Police Station-a Inlan Loh Vang Chauhin a Bail hi Sut Theih a Ni Lo

Supreme Court: Bail-a Awm Mek Chu Police Station-a Inlan Loh Vang Chauhin a Bail hi Sut Theih a Ni Lo

  • 10/12/2025
  • JC

Supreme Court chuan December ni 5, 2025 khan bail chu police station-a in report loh vang ringawtin sut theih a ni lo a ti. He thutlukna hi Sheikh Irshad @Monu-a appeal thehluh atanga lo chawr chhuak a ni a, ani hi Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench-in a bail an lo sut sak tawh a ni.Justice JK Maheshwari leh Justice Vijay Bishnoi-te thutna bench chuan he thubuai hi ngaihtuahin appeal chu an phal sak a. Bail order chu a ngai awhtirin, High Court bail sut thutlukna chu a thiah sak a. Tin, report tura thu a zawm loh avangin High Court chuan a bail chu a sut sak thei lo tih a sawi bawk.An Buaina Bul:Irshad-a (Thubuai thehluttu) hi kum 2020 khan Gittikhadan Police Station, Nagpur-a NDPS Act hnuaia Section 20 leh 29-ah leh Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA)-a Section 3(1)(i)(ii), 3(2) leh 3(4) hnuaia FIR register pakhatah puh a ni a. He thubuaiah hian Ganja 2kg 728g man a ni.Kum khat leh thla sawm pakhat dawn police kuta a awm hnuah,  Bombay High Court chuan bail phal sakin kum 2022 August thla khan a chhuak a. Tualchhung police station-ah thla tin ni 1 leh ni 16-ah inlan turin court hian a hriattir bawk.Supreme Court Ngaihdan leh Thuchhuah:Supreme Court chuan bail pek a nih hnuah, investigation chu zawhfel a nih tawh thu leh chargesheet chu thehluh a nih tawh thu a hmu a. Sessions Court ah thubuai hi ngaihtuah mek a ni a. Tin, thubuai thehluttu Irshad-a hi a tul angin trial court hmaah a inlan fo tih a sawi bawk.Supreme Court chuan High Court bail sutna chu thiatin, a tira bail an phalsakna chu a pawm sak a . Court chuan thubuai thehluttu chu bail a zawm theih tur thu sawiin ,trial court hmaah thuchhuah dang a awm a nih loh chuan a tul angin inlan zel turin a hriattir bawk (www.jclalnunsanga.in).( He thubuai hi Sheikh Irhsad @Monu Vs State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal @SLP(Crl) Diary No. 60194 of 2025 a ni .)

Catholic Bishops Conference Of India Chuan Supreme Court-ah Rajasthan Anti-Conversion Law A Khinglet

Catholic Bishops Conference Of India Chuan Supreme Court-ah Rajasthan Anti-Conversion Law A Khinglet

  • 10/12/2025
  • Admin

Supreme Court chuan ni 8, December 2025(Thawhtanni) khan Catholic Bishops Conference of India in Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2025  chungchangah writ petition a thehluh thu hriattirna a pe a. He thubuai hi ni 23, January 2026(Zirtawpni) a ngaihtuah tura dah a ni. Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2025 kawihhnawiha thubuai thehluh dangte nen ngaihtuah tlan tur a tih a ni a.M Huzaifa and Anr v State of Rajasthan & Ors [W.P.(C) No. 1047/2025], Dashrath Kumar Hinunia v. State of Rajasthan [W.P.(C) No. 1044/2025, Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v State of Rajasthan [W.P. (C) No. 1126/2025 leh Jaipur Catholic Welfare Society v. State of Rajasthan [W.P.(C) No. 1108/2025] Justice Vikram Nath leh Justice Sandeep Mehta te thubuai ngaihtuahlai nena ngaihtuah tlan a ni ang.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta  chuan Division Bench, Justice Dipankar Datta leh Justice AG Masih te hnenah chuan Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat leh Uttar Pradesh ah te anti-religious conversion Act kaihhnawih thubuai kal lai mek a awm thu a hrilh a, thubuai inang an nih thu a sawi a. Hei vang hian Court chuan thubuai hote chu Bench pakhata ngaihtuah tlan turin a ti ta a ni.Thubuai thehluh chungchang:He thubuai thehluhah hian Section 5(6), 10(3), 12, leh 13 te chu  abik takin a sawi lang a, he dan hian ‘unlawful religious conversion’ kaihhnawihah an thiamlohna tihchian a nih hma hauhin  thuneihna kengkawhtute chu mimal in leh lo leh thil neihte chu hren sak emaw tihchhiat sak theihna emaw a neih tir, tiin an sawi a.Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2025 hnuaia Section 5(6) hian dan lo anga sakhaw danga inlehna a awmin, sakhaw danga inlehna atana an hman in leh lo chu tlan chhuah leh tura lak sak theih an nih thu leh District Magistrate emaw State Government-in a an rawih, gazetted officer-in chhui chianna a neih chu pawm anih hnuah lak sak theih a ni.Section 10(3) hian institution emaw organization emaw in he dan an bawhchhiat chuan an state chhunga eng thil mah ti thei tawh lo turin, State Government emaw thuneihna kengkawh tura ruat emaw chuan an registration emaw an license emaw chu a tihtawp sak theih thu a sawi.Section 12 chuan in leh lo engpawh emaw a chhehvel emaw dan lova sakhaw danga inlehna hmun atana an hman chu chhui chianna neih a nih hnuah District Magistrate emaw sorkarin thuneihna kengkawh tura a ruat chuan  tlan chhuah leh theih tura a lak sak theih thu a sawi a.Section 13 chuan dan kalha in sak, dan kalh a sakhaw danga inlehna atana an hman chu tih chhiat theihna a pe bawk .Hemi mai bakah hian institution emaw organization emaw te bank account chu tihchet theih lova dah sak theih a ni a, an in leh lo te chu lak sak theih a ni bawk,  dan kalha che chu vaibelchhekhat chawitir tur an ni bawk.Thubuai thehluttute hian hetianga in leh lo tihchhiat theihna leh a huhoa hremna hian India Danpui Article 14, 21, 22 leh 300A te a kalh thu an sawi a. Trial neih hmaa in leh lo tih chhiat leh lak sak theihhna thuneihna kengkawhtute pek hian dan lalna(rule of law) leh thuneihna insem(separation of powers) chu dan lo anga a luahlan daih thu an sawi a ni.Thubuai kal lai mek te:Tun a thubuai kan sawi lai zing ami hi Citizens for Justice and Peace in a an thehluh a ni a, hetah hian UP anti-religious conversion Act chu an khinglet a. Hemi zawhah hian Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind chuan UP anti-conversion Act chu a khinglet ve leh a ni.Kum 2024 a hemi chungchang thubuai ngaihtuah a nih khan , Supreme chuan tawngkain UP anti-conversion law chhunga dan thenkhat chuan India Danpui Article 25 chu a kalh thu a lo sawi tawh a. Kumin vek khan sakhaw danga a huhova inlehtirna chungchanga puhna avanga Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Science (SHUATS), Prayagraj, Vice Chancellor leh thuneitu dangte chunga thubuai thehluh a,  FIR a sut sak hnu chuan Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 chuan sakhaw dang vuan duh te tan zawm theih loh tawp tur dan a siam a ni, tiin a lo sawi tawh bawk.Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Gujarat leh  state sorkar dangte’n a  sakhaw inlehna dan an siam chungchanga PIL hrang hrang thehluh a ni tawh bawk(www.jclalnunsanga.in)(He thubuai Catholic Bishops Conference of India vs. The State of Rajasthan W.P.(C) No. 1187/2025 ah hian thubuai thehluttute tan Senior Advocate Romy Chacko, AOR Alex Joseph leh ukil dangte an ding a, Rajasthan sorkar tan Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, Additional Advocate General Shiv Mangal Sharma leh AOR Nidhi Jaswal te an ding a ni.)

High Court-in FIR Ṭhiah An Phal Lo A Nih Chuan Pre-Arrest Bail An Phalsak Tur A Ni Lo; Pawikhawihtua Puh Chuan Sessions Court-ah Bail A Dil Hmasa Tur A Ni: Supreme Court

High Court-in FIR Ṭhiah An Phal Lo A Nih Chuan Pre-Arrest Bail An Phalsak Tur A Ni Lo; Pawikhawihtua Puh Chuan Sessions Court-ah Bail A Dil Hmasa Tur A Ni: Supreme Court

  • 05/12/2025
  • JC

Ni 1, December 2025 (Thawhṭanni) khan Supreme Court, Division Bench, Justice Vikram Nath leh Justice Sandeep Mehta te chuan, Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs. State of Uttar Pradesh thubuaiah, High Court-in pawikhawihtua puh laka FIR a ṭhiat duh lo a nih chuan pre-arrest bail (anticipatory bail)  an phalsak theih loh thu an sawi. Court chuan pre-arrest bail chu Sessions Court aṭangin pawikhawihtua puh chuan a dil tur a ni, tiin an sawi a. Pre-arrest bail chu  Uttar Pradesh sorkar chuan an dil theih thu an sawi a; amaherawhchu, writ petition kaltlanga man theihna laka venhimna dawng turin High Court hnenah kal nghal tur a ni lo, tiin Bench chuan an sawi. Mi tu pawh pawikhawihtua puh a nih emaw, dan kalha che a puh a nih chuan, pre-arrest bail chu phalna pe theitu, Sessions Court aṭangin a dil hmasa phawt tur a ni, tiin an sawi a. High Court-in writ jurisdiction a neih chu in bail chhuahna hmun atan hman tur a ni lo, tiin Bench chuan an sawi a ni.Eng nge pre-arrest bail chu?Pre-arrest bail (anticipatory bail) hi mi tu pawh, bail theih loh thila man a nih hma pawha bail-a chhuahtir theihna a ni a. Pre-arrest bail hi High Court emaw, Sessions Court-in an pe thei a. Mi tu pawh, bail theih loh thila pawikhawihna chungchangah an man dawna a inhriat chuan Section 482, BNSS hnuaiah pre-arrest bail hi a dil thei a ni.Thubuai Chungchang leh Supreme Court Ngaihdan:He thubuai hi Allahabad High Court thutlukna khinletna a ni a, High Court chuan he thubuaiah hian pawikhawihtu laka FIR theh luh chu a sut duh lova; nimahsela, pawikhawihtua puh hnenah hian chargesheet an theh luh hma thleng daih turin, man theihna laka ven himna (pre-arrest bail) pek a phalsak a ni. He thil thleng hian thubuai chhuina kawngah thil pawi a thlen theih thu Court chuan a sawi a. Tin, Bench chuan High Court-in he thupek a siam hian awmze nei tak leh chhia leh ṭha hriatna nena chhutna a awm lo, tiin an sawi bawk. FIR theh luh chu sut duh lo tur khawpa pawikhawihna lian a nih chuan man lohna tura ven himna chu awlsam taka pek tur a nih loh thu an sawi.Supreme Court chuan an thutlukna hmasa, chutih hun laia CJI, Dr. DY Chandrachud kaihhruaina hnuaia thutlukna an lo siam tawh,  Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharastra thubuai chungchang an tarlang a. He thubuaiah hian High Court chuan  Section 482 CrPC emaw, India Danpui Article 226 hnuaia petition theh luh a tihtawp chuan, man phal lohna thupek emaw, chutiang ang thupek chu chhui zuina neih lai emaw, chhui zuina an neih zawh thleng emaw, final report/chargesheet emaw Section 173 CrPC hnuaia an theh luh thlengin an phalsak theih loh thu a sawi.Supreme Court chuan High Court order pahnih (Dt.16.06.2025 leh 15.07.25) te chu a sut a. Ngaihtuah ṭhat leh turin High Court hnenah an thawnkir a. Bench chuan petition sutna chungchang hi a thara ngaihtuah ṭha turin leh a hmaa thu ngaihthlak tawh zawng zawngah chuan innghat lo turin a ti a ni. High Court order chu sut ni mah se,  man theihna laka ven himna an  pek lailawk tawh chu phal chhunzawm a nih thu an sawi thung a. He ven himna hi High Court-in thubuai a ngaihtuah fel hma chu a huam ang a. Supreme Court chuan January ni 7, 2026 aṭanga chhiara thla li chhungin he thubuaiah hian thutlukna siam turin a ti a ni. (www.jclalnunsanga.in)(He thubuai  SPL(Crl) No.17464-17465 of 2025, Sanjay Gupta Vs State of UP-ah hian thubuai thehluttu tan Roopansh Purohit, AoR a ding a. Lehlam tan hian Ratnakar Dash Sr, Adv, Shashank Shekhar Singh, AoR leh mi dangte an ding a ni.)

Supreme Court-in Rualbanlote Thlavang A Hauh; Rualbanlote Tan Dan Thar Siam Turin Sorkar Laipui A Nawr

Supreme Court-in Rualbanlote Thlavang A Hauh; Rualbanlote Tan Dan Thar Siam Turin Sorkar Laipui A Nawr

  • 04/12/2025
  • Admin

Ni 27 November, 2025-a thubuai ngaihtuahnaah, Supreme Court chuan sorkar laipui chu Scheduled Castes leh Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act anga rualbanlote tan dan siam turin a nawr. Supreme Court chuan NGO Cure SMA Foundation-te’n an theh luh petition chu a ngaihtuah a. Supreme Court, Division Bench, Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant leh Justice Joymalya Bagchi-te chuan vantlang zinga inthliar hranna leh innuihsawhna laka rualbanlote zahawmna leh dikna chanvo venhimna ṭha neih a ngaih thu an sawi a. He dilna (petition) -ah hian online-a thil pho chhuah chungchangah inkaihhruaina khauh zawk siam turin an ti a. Tin, fiamthu thawh thiam Samray Raina  leh social media influencer dangte’n rualbanlote an nuihsawhna chungchangah chet la turin an ti a ni.He thubuai an ngaihtuah lai hian CJI Surya Kant chuan Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta  hnenah chuan Scheduled Castes leh Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act nena inang rualbanlote tan dan siam a nih theih loh chhan a zawt a. Supreme Court chuan fiamthu thawh thiam Samay Raina chu rualbanlote a nuihzatna chungchangah na takin a hau va, a ngaihdam dilna leh a pawikhawih chu a intluk tur a ni tiin an sawi. CJI Surya Kant chuan, "Vawiin hian rualbanlote chanchin lungngaihthlak tak kan nei a, naktuk hian hmeichhia a ni thei a, chutah naupang a ni thei a, chutah kum lama upa zawkte ... he society (khawtlang) hi khawiah nge a awm dawn?" tiin a sawi chhuak a ni.Supreme Court chuan hetianga thil thleng dangte chu chhinchhiah a, ziak chhawn a, a video-te nen theh lut tur leh a lak kian dan turte pe a, theh lut turin a ti a ni. Supreme Court chuan zalen taka thusawi theihna hian khawtlanga mi chak lo zawkte chu tihelna leh deuhsawhna thu kaltlanga hnuaichhiah theihna a pek loh thu an sawi. (www.jclalnunsanga.in)(He thubuai Ranveer Gautam Allahabadia vs. Union of India And Ors. thubuaiah hian thubuai theh luttu tan Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, AOR Ansha Varma leh ukil dangte an ding a, an khinna chhangtu lam tan Attorney General for India R Venkataramani, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, AOR Aman Mehta leh ukil dangte an ding)

Hmeichhiain Mi Mal Thil A Ti Lai Ni Lo Mipain A Thla A Laksak Emaw, Video A Laksak Chuan Voyeurism A Ni Lo: Supreme Court

Hmeichhiain Mi Mal Thil A Ti Lai Ni Lo Mipain A Thla A Laksak Emaw, Video A Laksak Chuan Voyeurism A Ni Lo: Supreme Court

  • 04/12/2025
  • Admin

Supreme Court, Divison Bench,  Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh leh Justice Manmohan te chuan ni 2, December 2025 (Thawhlehni) a thutlukna an siam tak,  Tuhin Kumar Biswas vs. The State of West Bengal thubuaiah chuan, hmeichhia chu a phalna tel lova thla laksak emaw, video laksak emaw ni mah se,  mi mal thil a ti lai (private act) a nih loh  chuan Section 354C IPC hnuaiah voyeurism a nih loh  thu an sawi.Division Bench Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh leh Justice Manmohan te chuan hmeichhe pakhat, in leh lo buai chhunga luh a tum avanga mipa pakhatin a video a laksak avanga thubuai a neih tak chungchangah thla laksaktu mipa chu a chhuah zalen a, he thubuai hi a titawp ta a ni.Eng nge ‘Voyeurism’ chu ?Ṭawngkam tluang pangngai chuan ‘Voyeurism’ chu mi dangte saruak emaw, mipat-hmeichhiatna lama an inhnamhnawih lai emaw, mipat-hmeichhiatna lama intihhlimna atana lo hman ve hi a ni. Voyeurism hi Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 Section 354C hnuaiah leh Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 Section 77-ah te kan hmu a. IPC leh BNS hnuaiah hian voyeurism chungchanga dan kalha chetna a awm dawn chuan hengte hi thil thlen laia awm ngei ngei turte an ni:A thlirtu emaw, thla laksaktu emaw, theh darhtu emaw chu mipa a ni tur a ni.Mipain a thlir emaw, thla a laksak emaw, a theh darh emaw chu hmeichhia a ni tur a ni.Hmeichhia chu mipain a thlir emaw, thla a laksak emaw, a theh darh emaw chu mi mal thil a ti lai a ni tur a ni.Mi mal thil a tih laiin a huam chu - inthiarna a hman lai, vantlang hmaa tih ngai loh mipat-hmeichhiatna lampanga inhnamhnawih lai, kekawrte chauh a hak lai, a hnute lan lai, a serh emaw, a mawng lan lai.Heng mi mal thil a tih lai hian a thlirtu emaw, a thla laksaktu emaw, a theh darhtu emaw hian an hmuh a ring tur a ni lo. Chutianga mipain hmeichhia a thlir emaw, thla a laksak chu hmeichhe phalna tel lovin a ni tur a ni.A tuartu hmeichhia chuan a thla laksak turin phalna a pe a; mahse, theh darh tura phalna a pek loh chuan, a theh darhna chu voyeurism a ni ang.Hengte hi a awm loh chuan IPC leh BNS hnuaiah chuan mipain voyeurism pawikhawihna a nei lo a ni.A hremnate:Hemi chungchangah hian dan kalhin mipa a che a nih chuan hetiang hian hrem theih a ni-Thiam loh chantir a nih vawi khatnaah chuan kum khat aia tlem lo lung in tan a ni a. Mahse, lung in tan hun chhung hi kum thum thleng pawh sei theih a ni. Pawisa chawitir theih a ni bawk.Thiam loh chantir vawi hnihna emaw, a hnuah emaw chuan, kum thum aia tlem lo lung in tantir theih a ni a. Mahse, kum 7 thleng lungin tan hun chhung hi pawh sei  theih a ni. Pawisa chawitir theih a ni bawk.Supreme Court chuan, mipa pakhatin, in leh lo inchuh lai meka luh tum hmeichhe pakhat thla a laksak vang ringawta voyeurism anga puh a nih chu police leh trial court-te thiam loh niin an sawi. He thutlukna an siam lai hian Bench chuan, voyeurism chungchanga mipa laka chargesheet theh luh leh charge siamah police leh trial court-te chu an fimkhur lehzual tur a ni; bik takin, dan kalha chetna a awm ngei a ni tih rinhlelh theihna tur lian a awm a nih loh phei chuan, tiin Bench chuan an sawi. Hetianga rinhlelhna lian tak awm lo chunga thubuai kalpui a ni hian rorelna dik thlenna tur a tih ṭhuanawp ṭhin thu an sawi a. Hei bakah hian Judge-te, court staff leh prosecutor-te chuan an hun hlu tak, thubuai khirhkhan leh pawimawh zawk an ngaihtuahna tur hun a tibuai ṭhin a ni, an ti.Tuhin Kumar Biswas vs. The State of West Bengal chungchang:He thubuai hi Salt Lake, Kolkata-a chenna in pakhat chungchanga unau pahnih inkara hun rei tak chhung buaina awm avanga appeal (thutlukna khin letna) a ni a. He thubuai a rinhlelh, Tuhin Kumar Biswas hi, he thubuaia chenna in neitu pahnih zinga pakhat zawk fapa a ni. He thubuai hi kum 2018 aṭanga inṭan a ni a, pawikhawihna thlentua an puh hian a unaupa lakah civil suit a theh lut a. Civil Court chuan ni 29, November 2018 khan an unau pahnih chuan joint possession (neitu nihna intawm) tur leh third-party rights (an unau pahnih ni lo mi dang neitu nihna chanvo pek) siam lo turin a hriattir a. He thupek hi criminal thubuai theh luttu,  Mamta Agarwal-in March 2020-a he thubuaia chhenna in a tlawh lai khan a la ding reng a ni.Pawikhawihtua puh putea thupek angin thubuai theh luttu hian FIR chu a theh lut a. Dik lo taka a khuahkhirh thu te, a tihṭhaih thu te, a thlalak leh video te chu a phalna tel lova a laksak thu te chu a sawi a ni. August 16, 2020 khan thubuai theh luttuin he a thusawi hi a dik ngei a ni tih a sawi duh lo chungin police-te chuan IPC Section 341 (wrongful restraint), 354C (voyeurism) and 506 (criminal intimidation) hnuaiah chargesheet an theh lut a ni. Trial court leh Calcutta High Court ten an chhuah zalen duh loh hnu chuan pawikhawihtua puh hian Supreme Court hnenah a thlen leh a ni.Thiam Chantirna/Chhuah Zalen (Discharge) chungchanga Supreme Court thusawi:Supreme Court chuan thiam chantirna (discharge) chungchanga dan siam chu a tarlang a. Prosecution-in finfiahna a neih chu pawikhawihtuin thil a tisual  ngei a ni tih rinhlelhna nasa tak a awm chauhvin case chu thubuai ngaihtuah (trial) tura kalpui theih a nih thu a sawi a. Bench chuan, he stage-a court-te hian case ṭha tawk lote chu trial-a a luh loh nan filter (thlifimtu) angin an thawk tih a sawifiah.Hemi hnu hian court chuan FIR leh chargesheet-ah hian voyeurism  a awm leh awm loh a enfiah a. Voyeurism hi hmeichhiain mi mal thil a tih lai en emaw, thla laksak emaw, a inphelh ruah lai emaw, bathroom a hman lai emaw, mipat-hmeichhiatna hman emaw a nih thu a sawi. Court chuan he thubuaiah hian chutianga mi mal thil ti lai engmah an puhnaah a awm lo tih anm hmu a.Hengte avang hian Court chuan criminal thubuaia FIR theh luh hi chhungkaw inkara intihbuaina aṭanga lo chhuak niin a hmu a. Supreme Court chuan pawikhawihtua puh hi a chhuah zalen ta a ni.