Labour Law Hnuaia ‘Industry’ Awmzia Hrilhfiahna Siam That Chungchanga India Rama Thil Thleng Khat Supreme Court 9 Judge Bench-in Ngaihtuah Tan
- Mar 17, 2026
- Admin
India rama thil thleng khat Judge pakua thutna Supreme Court chuan labour law hnuaia “industry” awmzia chungchang thubuai pawimawh tak chu vawiin atangin a ngaihtuah tan a. Chief Justice Surya Kant-a hova judge pakua awmna Constitution Bench chuan vawiin khan he thubuai hi an ngaihtuah tan. He buaina hi State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jai Bir Singh thubuai atanga lo chhuak a ni a, hetah hian Court chuan a hmaa Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa thubuai-a thutlukna siam chu a dik leh dik loh a endik a. Kha thubuaiah khan, Court chuan hlawkna um miah lohna hna tam tak pawh huamtirin “industry” awmzia chu zau takin a lo hrilhfiah tawh a ni.
Thubuai ngaihtuah a nih laiin, Attorney General chuan Bangalore thubuaia tehna (test) an lo zam chu a tlangpuiin a dik a, mahse a chang chuan a huam zau mah mah thin, tiin a sawi a. “Triple test” (tehna pathum) paltlang thei hna zawng zawngte chu industry anga ngaih vek ngawt tur a ni lo, a ti bawk. Judge-te chuan a hnu lama dan lo awm thar, entirnan Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 leh Industrial Relations Code, 2020 ten he hrilhfiahnaah hian nghawng an neih theih dan tur an sawiho bawk. Nimahsela, Court chuan 1982 amendment hi hman (enforce) a ni ngai lo tih leh 2020 Code hi dodal (challenge) mek a nih avangin innghahnan a hman thuah fimkhur a ngai tih a tarlang.
Court chuan sorkar-in mipuite hamthatna atana a thil tihte chu industry anga ngaih tur a ni em tih chu a ngaihtuah tel a. Attorney General chuan chung thil tam takte chu Sorkar-in Constitution hnuaia a tih tur (constitutional duties) a nih avangin telh ve tur a ni lo, tiin a sawi. Judge-te chuan sorkar thuneihna sang ber hmanga a hnathawhte (“sovereign functions”) awmzia sawiho in, zau taka hrilhfiah tur nge zim tea hrilhfiah tur tih an sawi ho bawk. Tunlai khawvelah chuan sorkar hnathawh tam tak hi sumdawnna hna (commercial work) nen a inang hle a, mahse mipui nawlpui tana tih a ni zawk tih an tarlang a ni.
Bangalore thubuaia “industry” hrilhfiahna zau lutuk avanga buaina a lo chhuah dan, thubuai tam tak leh thutlukna inang lo tak tak a thlen phah dante pawh Court chuan a enfiah bawk. Kum 2005 khan, hrilhfiahna chu a fiah tawk avangin leh judge-te zingah ngaihdan inang lo a awm avangin he thu hi bench lian zawk hnenah thlen a lo ni tawh a ni. Tun a judge pakua awmna bench hian tunlai sum leh pai dinhmun (economic conditions) leh hnathawktute leh a ruaitute hamthatna inbuktawk taka siam a ngaihna te ngaihtuah chungin, hrilhfiahna hlui chu hman chhunzawm tur nge thlak tur tih an ngaihtuah fel tawh dawn a ni(www.jclalnunsanga.in)
(He thubuai hi C.A. No. 897/2002 State of UP vs. Jai Bir Singh a ni)